Developmental control of CD8+ T cell–avidity maturation in autoimmune diabetes
J. Clin. Invest. Bingye Han, et al. 115:1879 doi:10.1172/JCI24219 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 4Striking differences in the developmental biology of 17.4α/8.3β and 17.5α/8.3β T cells in Tg mice. Flow cytometry of thymocytes (
A–
D) and splenocytes (
E–
H). (
A and
E) Representative CD4 versus CD8 dot plots.
P values for percentage of thymic and splenic CD8
+CD4
– cells were as follows:
P < 0.017 (for 17.4α/8.3β Tg vs. 17.5α/8.3β Tg, 5- to 9-week-old mice). (
B–
D and
F–
H) Comparison of mfi with which the different T cell subsets stain with anti–TCR-Vβ8 or anti–TCR-β mAbs or with IGRP
206–214 tetramers. Values on the panels correspond to percentage of cells contained within each quadrant (
A and
E) or to percentage of cells within each gate that stained (
B–
D and
F–
H) (mean ± SE). **
P < 0.05 versus 17.4α/8.3β Tg mice. Representative histograms are shown.
A–
D and
E–
H are representative of 4–5 mice per strain per age group. Note that the representative dot plots and histograms corresponding to 17.4α/8.3β Tg mice are the same as those shown in Figure
2. The data are rendered twice to facilitate comparisons with results obtained with Tg mice bearing lower- (Figure
2) or higher-avidity T cells (this figure).