Critical roles of c-Jun signaling in regulation of NFAT family and RANKL-regulated osteoclast differentiation
J. Clin. Invest. Fumiyo Ikeda, et al. 114:475 doi:10.1172/JCI19657 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 4Activation of NFAT1 by RANKL signals and requirement of NFAT for osteoclastogenesis. (
A) Activation of NFAT transcriptional activity during osteoclast differentiation. RAW264 cells incubated with or without sRANKL were transfected with a luciferase reporter construct containing three copies of NFAT-responsive elements. Luciferase activity in cell lysates was measured. TRAP (+), TRAP
+ osteoclast-like cells treated with sRANKL. RLU, relative light units. (
B) Expression of NFAT1 in BMMΦ cells. The lysates of BMMΦ cells were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-NFAT1 antibody. (
C) Nuclear translocation of NFAT1 by sRANKL. RAW264 cells were stimulated with or without sRANKL, and cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-NFAT1 antibody. (
D) Expression of NFAT1 in osteoclasts. Mouse spleen cells were incubated with M-CSF and sRANKL for 6 days and analyzed by immunostaining (upper panel) or immunoblotting (lower panel) using NFAT1 antibody. (
E) Transcriptional activation of NFAT1 by TRAF6. COS-7 cells were transfected with a luciferase reporter construct containing three copies of NFAT-responsive elements together with either NFAT1 or TRAF6, or both. Luciferase activity in cell lysates was measured. (
F) Suppression of osteoclastogenesis by cyclosporin A. Mouse bone marrow cells were incubated with M-CSF and sRANKL for 6 days in the presence or absence of cyclosporin A (CsA) as indicated. TRAP
+ multinucleated osteoclast-like cells were counted under a microscope. (
G) Inhibition of osteoclastogenesis by NFAT inhibitor, VIVIT peptide. RAW264 cells infected with control or GFP-VIVIT adenovirus at 20 or 50 MOI were incubated with sRANKL for 6 days, and TRAP
+ multinucleated osteoclast-like cells were counted.