Heterologous immunity provides a potent barrier to transplantation tolerance
J. Clin. Invest. Andrew B. Adams, et al. 111:1887 doi:10.1172/JCI17477 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 2A critical number of CD8
+ central memory T cells are needed to resist tolerance. Naive B6 mice (CD45.2) received T cells from sensitized congenic B6 mice (CD45.1). (
a) Titration of memory cell numbers. Naive recipients received varying doses of T cells (calculated number of memory cells transferred in brackets) from sensitized hosts (2 × 10
7 [400,000], filled squares; 10
7 [200,000], filled diamonds; 5 × 10
6 [100,000], filled triangles; 2 × 10
6 [40,000], open diamonds; 10
6 [20,000], open triangles; 2 × 10
7 naive cells [none], open squares). (
b) CD8
+ memory T cells represent a potent barrier to tolerance induction. Purified CD4
+, CD8
+, or whole T cells were isolated from sensitized mice and transferred to naive congenic mice. Mice receiving either naive selected cells (data not shown) or CD4
+ T cells (filled diamonds) from sensitized donors developed high-level donor cell chimerism and accepted donor-type skin grafts indefinitely. The transfer of CD8
+ T cells (filled triangles) from sensitized animals prevented tolerance induction in a similar fashion to transferred whole T cells (filled squares) (MST, 21 days). (
c) CD8
+ central memory T cells promote rejection more efficiently than “effector” memory T cells. Equal numbers of CD8
+ (open squares), CD8
+ CD62L
hi (filled squares), or CD8
+ CD62L
lo (open triangles) antigen-specific memory T cells were transferred to naive congenic hosts, which were then subjected to the tolerance protocol (control naive CD8
+ T cells, filled triangles). Both unseparated CD8
+ memory T cells and central CD8
+ memory T cells efficiently rejected allogeneic skin grafts in less than 3 weeks (MST, 21 and 18 days, respectively). In contrast, effector memory T cells of the traditional CD62L
lo memory phenotype were less effective at promoting rejection (MST, more than 70 days;
P < 0.01).