Cancer-associated immunodeficiency and dendritic cell abnormalities mediated by the prostaglandin EP2 receptor
J. Clin. Invest. Li Yang, et al. 111:727 doi:10.1172/JCI16492 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 4Inhibition of expression of DC markers by PGE
2. (
a) Characterization of EP2 receptor expression in bone marrow progenitors of wild-type and
EP2–/– mice. Total RNA was extracted from bone marrow progenitors, and cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR. Primers specific for the EP2 receptor were used. Lane 1, DNA marker; lane 2, wild type; lane 3,
EP2–/–; lane 4 and 5, no reverse transcriptase control for wild type and
EP2–/–, respectively. (
b) DC differentiation to CD11c
+, I-Ad
+, CD86
+, and CD40
+ cells was significantly inhibited after PGE
2 treatment. Bone marrow progenitors from
EP2–/– (white bars) and wild-type (black bars) mice were cultured in GM-CSF/IL-4 medium with increasing concentrations of PGE
2. At day 9, FACScan flow cytometer was used to analyze the phenotype of DCs. The percentage of expression is normalized relative to untreated cells from wild-type mice. Each surface marker was plotted on a bar graph as shown in
b. Graphs depict: (
c) CD11c; (
d) CD86; (
e) MHC class II; and (
f) CD40. Untreated wild-type cells (black bars), wild-type treated with 100 nM PGE
2 (gray bars), untreated
EP2–/– cells (white bars),
EP2–/– cells treated with 100 nM PGE
2 (dark gray bars). The PGE
2 dose response for CD11c expression is a representative experiment from two independent experiments with similar results. All others are from three to four independent experiments. For each graph there is a statistically significant difference between wild-type/no PGE
2 and wild-type/PGE
2 (
P < 0.05); there are no statistically significant differences between
EP2–/–/no PGE
2 and
EP2–/–/PGE
2 (
P > 0.05).